Volume 15, Issue 6 And S7 (Artificial Intelligence- In Press 2025)
J Research Health 2025, 15(6 And S7): 0-0 |
Back to browse issues page
Ethics code: NOT (Review article)
Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
Keykha A, Hojati M, Taghavi Monfared A, Shahrokhi J. Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare: Unveiling Ethical Challenges Through Meta-Synthesis of Evidence. J Research Health 2025; 15 (6)
URL: http://jrh.gmu.ac.ir/article-1-2834-en.html
URL: http://jrh.gmu.ac.ir/article-1-2834-en.html
1- Postdoctoral Researcher at Research Institute for Science, Technology and Industry Policy, Sharif University of Technology, Tehran, Iran , ahmad.keykha72@sharif.edu
2- General Psychology, Faculty of Literature and Humanities, Guilan University, Rasht, Iran.
3- Department of Educational Administration and Planning, Faculty of Psychology and Education, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran
4- Department of Educational Administration and Planning, Faculty of Psychology and Education, The University of Tehran,
2- General Psychology, Faculty of Literature and Humanities, Guilan University, Rasht, Iran.
3- Department of Educational Administration and Planning, Faculty of Psychology and Education, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran
4- Department of Educational Administration and Planning, Faculty of Psychology and Education, The University of Tehran,
Abstract: (10 Views)
Background: With the rapid advancement of artificial intelligence (AI) technologies in healthcare systems, alongside their numerous benefits, various ethical concerns have emerged regarding their application in different areas. This study aimed to identify the ethical challenges associated with the implementation of AI in healthcare.
Methods: This research employed a qualitative meta-synthesis method using a thematic analysis approach. In accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, qualitative and review studies published between 2010 and 2025 that addressed ethical issues related to AI applications in healthcare were analyzed. The quality of the included studies was assessed using the Critical Appraisal Skills Programme (CASP) checklist, and confidence in the findings was evaluated based on the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation–Confidence in the Evidence from Reviews of Qualitative research (GRADE-CERQual) approach.
Results: Out of thirty-eight selected studies, seven main themes and thirty-three subthemes were identified. The key challenges included risks to privacy and data security, limited transparency and explainability, algorithmic bias, undermining the autonomy of patients and healthcare professionals, interference with professional responsibilities, reduced quality of clinical judgment, and regulatory and legal gaps. Furthermore, the commercial use of health data and the absence of integrated ethical frameworks have exacerbated concerns related to justice, public trust, and human-centered care.
Conclusion: The findings of this study indicate that the ethical and evidence-based integration of AI into healthcare requires the development of transparent regulatory frameworks, the enhancement of ethical digital literacy within the medical profession, and the formulation of comprehensive policies to protect patient rights and promote health equity. These results can serve as a strategic foundation for decision-making by policymakers, technology developers, and clinical professionals.
Methods: This research employed a qualitative meta-synthesis method using a thematic analysis approach. In accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, qualitative and review studies published between 2010 and 2025 that addressed ethical issues related to AI applications in healthcare were analyzed. The quality of the included studies was assessed using the Critical Appraisal Skills Programme (CASP) checklist, and confidence in the findings was evaluated based on the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation–Confidence in the Evidence from Reviews of Qualitative research (GRADE-CERQual) approach.
Results: Out of thirty-eight selected studies, seven main themes and thirty-three subthemes were identified. The key challenges included risks to privacy and data security, limited transparency and explainability, algorithmic bias, undermining the autonomy of patients and healthcare professionals, interference with professional responsibilities, reduced quality of clinical judgment, and regulatory and legal gaps. Furthermore, the commercial use of health data and the absence of integrated ethical frameworks have exacerbated concerns related to justice, public trust, and human-centered care.
Conclusion: The findings of this study indicate that the ethical and evidence-based integration of AI into healthcare requires the development of transparent regulatory frameworks, the enhancement of ethical digital literacy within the medical profession, and the formulation of comprehensive policies to protect patient rights and promote health equity. These results can serve as a strategic foundation for decision-making by policymakers, technology developers, and clinical professionals.
Type of Study: Review Article |
Subject:
● Artificial Intelligence
Received: 2025/07/2 | Accepted: 2025/08/26 | Published: 2025/12/24
Received: 2025/07/2 | Accepted: 2025/08/26 | Published: 2025/12/24
| Rights and permissions | |
 |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |
This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC-By-NC), which permits use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes.
Contact Information
