Accepted article
Back to the articles list |
Back to browse issues page
1- Amity University, Jaipur, Rajasthan, India
2- Department of Psychology, School of Humanities & Social Sciences, Doctor Harisingh Gour Vishwavidyalaya, Madhya Pradesh, India ,gyaneshpsychology@gmail.com
2- Department of Psychology, School of Humanities & Social Sciences, Doctor Harisingh Gour Vishwavidyalaya, Madhya Pradesh, India ,
Abstract: (30 Views)
Background: Unforgiveness refers to the prolonged unwillingness to forgive perceived wrongdoings, which can significantly affect mental and physical well-being, while resentment or grudges involve holding onto past grievances. This study examines gender differences in experiences and expressions of unforgiveness to address existing knowledge gaps.
Methods: In qualitative research, 34 university students (19 men & 15 women) were recruited via purposive and snowball sampling in 2022 from Sagar, Madhya Pradesh, India. Purposive sampling targets specific characteristics, while snowball sampling recruits similar participants. Both yield relevant data for thematic analysis but limit generalizability due to smaller, specific samples. Participants shared their unforgivable experiences in a semi-structured interview developed from previous unforgiveness studies. The transcriptions were analyzed thematically.
Results: The participants’ mean age was 26.43±2.88. The themes of similarities and differences in unforgiveness reflect shared and distinct experiences. Both genders reported feelings of hurt, revenge, and anger, with unforgiveness manifesting as avoidance and neglect. This suggests a common emotional and behavioural response, emphasizing the role of unforgiveness in personal growth and protection from future harm. However, gender-specific differences emerged in the nature of transgressions—men reported bullying and humiliation, while women emphasized cheating and sexual abuse. Additionally, men viewed unforgiveness as a tool for offender reform, whereas women saw it as protective.
Conclusion: Understanding gender differences in unforgiveness can guide gender-specific interventions, addressing men’s emphasis on reform and women’s protective motives. Further research should explore cultural influences on unforgiveness and test the effectiveness of tailored therapeutic interventions across diverse populations.
Methods: In qualitative research, 34 university students (19 men & 15 women) were recruited via purposive and snowball sampling in 2022 from Sagar, Madhya Pradesh, India. Purposive sampling targets specific characteristics, while snowball sampling recruits similar participants. Both yield relevant data for thematic analysis but limit generalizability due to smaller, specific samples. Participants shared their unforgivable experiences in a semi-structured interview developed from previous unforgiveness studies. The transcriptions were analyzed thematically.
Results: The participants’ mean age was 26.43±2.88. The themes of similarities and differences in unforgiveness reflect shared and distinct experiences. Both genders reported feelings of hurt, revenge, and anger, with unforgiveness manifesting as avoidance and neglect. This suggests a common emotional and behavioural response, emphasizing the role of unforgiveness in personal growth and protection from future harm. However, gender-specific differences emerged in the nature of transgressions—men reported bullying and humiliation, while women emphasized cheating and sexual abuse. Additionally, men viewed unforgiveness as a tool for offender reform, whereas women saw it as protective.
Conclusion: Understanding gender differences in unforgiveness can guide gender-specific interventions, addressing men’s emphasis on reform and women’s protective motives. Further research should explore cultural influences on unforgiveness and test the effectiveness of tailored therapeutic interventions across diverse populations.
Type of Study: Orginal Article |
Subject:
● Psychosocial Health
Received: 2024/08/12 | Accepted: 2024/10/16
Received: 2024/08/12 | Accepted: 2024/10/16
| Rights and permissions | |
 |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |
This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC-By-NC), which permits use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes.
Contact Information
