Volume 8, Issue 5 (Sep & Oct 2018)
J Research Health 2018, 8(5): 473-482 |
Back to browse issues page
Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
Nemati Sogolitappeh F. Comparison of the effectiveness of training of reality and spirituality on psychological well-being among students
. J Research Health 2018; 8 (5) :473-482
URL: http://jrh.gmu.ac.ir/article-1-1483-en.html
URL: http://jrh.gmu.ac.ir/article-1-1483-en.html
Department of Psychology, University of Tabriz, Tabriz, Iran
Abstract: (3495 Views)
The current research was conducted with the aim of comparing the effectiveness of training of reality and the spirituality on promoting psychological well-being in students. The method of this research was semi-experimental with experimental and control groups. In this study 45 university students were selected by sampling method as sample size and then the participants were randomly divided into three groups (two experimental and one control groups) which each group had 15 participants. A test group received nine 90-minute sessions of group-based reality training; the second group received nine sessions of two-hour spirituality training in group way, but the control group did not receive any intervention. Ryff's Psychological Well-Being Scales was used to collect information. The results showed that spiritual education has a higher effect on the education of reality in promoting the level of psychological well-being in students. Thus, it can be concluded that reality is influential in promoting the psychological well-being of the students and also the spiritual education and reality education significantly affect the level of psychological well-being in students, but spirituality is more effective than reality.
Type of Study: Orginal Article |
Subject:
Health Protection
Received: 2017/11/5 | Accepted: 2018/05/20 | Published: 2018/09/12
Received: 2017/11/5 | Accepted: 2018/05/20 | Published: 2018/09/12
| Rights and permissions | |
 |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |
This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC-By-NC), which permits use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes.
Contact Information
